
arXiv: astro-ph/0410602
We report on the abundance of interstellar neutral oxygen (OI) for 26 sightlines, using data from the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE), the International Spectroscopic Explorer (IUE), and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). OI column densities are derived by measuring the equivalent widths of several ultraviolet absorption lines, and subsequently fitting those to a curve of growth. We consider both our general sample of 26 sightlines and a more restrictive sample of 10 sightlines that utilize HST data for a measurement of the weak 1355 angstrom line of oxygen, and are thus better constrained due to our sampling of all three sections of the curve of growth. The column densities of our HST sample show ratios of O/H that agree with the current best solar value if dust is considered, with the possible exception of one sightline (HD 37903). We note some very limited evidence in the HST sample for trends of increasing depletion with respect to the ratio of total to selective extinction and the molecular fraction of hydrogen, but the trends are not conclusive. Unlike a recent result from Cartledge et al. (2004), we do not see evidence for increasing depletion with respect to the average volume density of hydrogen, but our HST sample contains only two points more dense than the critical density determined in that paper. The column densities of our more general sample show some scatter in O/H, but most agree with the solar value to within errors. We discuss these results in the context of establishing the best method for determining interstellar abundances, the unresolved question of the best value for O/H in the interstellar medium (ISM), the O/H ratios observed in Galactic stars, and the depletion of gas-phase oxygen onto dust grains.
62 total pages (37 text), 15 figures, 9 tables
Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics
Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 42 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
