
doi: 10.1086/365494
HE long and as yet unresolved debate T over the real meaning of Aristotle's doctrine of catharsis continues vigorously today. If ultimate truth has not yet been achieved, our understanding, at least, of important aesthetic problems has become sharper as we have debated the merits and flaws of the various interpretations of Aristotle's enigmatic doctrine that have been put forward. The present paper is a resumption of an argument presented in an earlier article in which Aristotle's use of catharsis in the Poetics was reinterpreted to mean "intellectual clarification."' Subsequent to the writing of that article I found that a version of the intellectual interpretation of Aristotelian catharsis had been made by a German scholar, S. 0. Haupt, in a monograph published in 1915.2 Haupt associated some sound arguments with other rather eccentric ones, and his work, virtually unknown today, has had no effect on the mainstream of criticism of the Poetics. Also, in an article published in 1966, H. D. F. Kitto, who does not mention and
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
