
doi: 10.1086/351377
CONTEMPORARY DISCUSSIONS of the relationship between geometry and physics sometimes begin with a brief nod of respect in the direction of Carl Friedrich Gauss or Nicolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky. The respect is usually limited to crediting them with the first awareness that the geometry of space is an empirical question, to be determined by actual measurements. 1 Carnap, Reichenbach, and Hempel all mention the legend that Gauss measured a triangle of mountain tops to see if there was any deviation from 1800.2 Similarly, Aleksandrov, Kolmogorov, and Lavrent'ev quote Lobachevsky's remark that the geometry of space will have to be "verified like other physical laws by experiments, such as astronomical observations."3 And Max Jammer's classic Concepts of Space notes that Lobachevsky tried to use parallax measurements
History of geometry, History of mathematics in the 19th century, History of mechanics of particles and systems
History of geometry, History of mathematics in the 19th century, History of mechanics of particles and systems
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
