
doi: 10.1086/340589
Observations have revealed that a hemispheric preference of magnetic chirality (handedness) exists throughout the solar atmosphere. For example, the current helicity of active regions is predominantly negative (left-handed twist) in the northern hemisphere and positive (right-handed twist) in the southern. The explanation of this hemispheric tendency is still open to question. In this paper we first review several possible mechanisms and clarify some misunderstandings. In our views, in the photosphere, the differential rotation acting on already emerged sunspot magnetic fields will lead to negative current helicity in the northern hemisphere and positive in the southern, but the same effect caused by the Coriolis force is opposite in sign. In the turbulent convection zone, the Coriolis force acting on the rising magnetic flux tubes will result in negative/positive helicity in the northern/southern hemisphere, but the corresponding action by the differential rotation will give rise to a reversed result. Moreover, in this region the α-effect will produce the wrong sign to explain the observed sense of magnetic twist. It should be noteworthy that the two current helicities generated by the α-effect, that in the mean field and that in the fluctuations, have opposite signs, and the former is positive/negative in the northern/southern hemisphere while the latter is negative/positive in the northern/southern hemisphere. In the overshoot region at the base of the convection zone, the current helicity created by the α-effect has the sign needed. Finally, we suggest that some surface flows (e.g., converging flows that can lead to cancellation of opposite-polarity flux in the photosphere) and magnetic reconnection are also important to the redistribution (or regeneration) of magnetic twist in active regions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
