
doi: 10.1086/313902
pmid: 10913404
Acinetobacter species are problematic nosocomial pathogens. In November 1997, pathogens isolated by microbiology laboratories were collected from 15 hospitals in Brooklyn, New York. Acinetobacter species accounted for 10% of gram-negative isolates. Only half of Acinetobacter species were susceptible to carbapenems; 11 hospitals had at least 1 isolate resistant to carbapenems. Other Acinetobacter susceptibility rates were as follows: polymyxin, 99%; amikacin, 87%; ampicillin/sulbactam, 47%; ceftazidime, 25%; and ciprofloxacin 23%. Overall, 10% were resistant to all commonly used antibiotics. Genetic analysis by use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of 12 carbapenem-resistant isolates revealed 4 strains that were recovered from >1 hospital, which suggests interinstitutional spread. Antibiotic usage data from 11 hospitals revealed that the use of third-generation cephalosporins was associated significantly with the percentage of carbapenem-resistant strains (P=.03). Resistant Acinetobacter species have become endemic in Brooklyn, New York. Citywide strategies that involve surveillance, infection-control practices, and the reduction of antibiotic usage may be necessary to control the spread of these pathogens.
DNA, Bacterial, Acinetobacter, Endemic Diseases, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Drug Synergism, Drug Resistance, Multiple, beta-Lactam Resistance, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field, Carbapenems, Prevalence, Humans, New York City, Acinetobacter Infections
DNA, Bacterial, Acinetobacter, Endemic Diseases, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Drug Synergism, Drug Resistance, Multiple, beta-Lactam Resistance, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field, Carbapenems, Prevalence, Humans, New York City, Acinetobacter Infections
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 227 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
