
arXiv: astro-ph/9905170
Analysis of initial observations sky surveys has shown that the resulting photometric catalogs, combined with far-red optical data, provide an extremely effective method of finding isolated, very low-temperature objects in the general field. Follow-up observations have already identified more than 25 sources with temperatures cooler than the latest M dwarfs. A comparison with detailed model predictions (Burrows & Sharp 1999) indicates that these L dwarfs have effective temperatures between 2000 ± 100 K and 1500 ± 100 K, while the available trigonometric parallax data place their luminosities at between 10-3.5 and 10. Those properties, together with the detection of lithium in one-third of the objects, are consistent with the majority having substellar masses. The mass function cannot be derived directly, since only near-infrared photometry and spectral types are available for most sources, but we can incorporate VLM/brown dwarf models in simulations of the solar neighborhood population and constrain (M) by comparing the predicted L dwarf surface densities and temperature distributions against observations from the Deep Near-Infrared Survey (DENIS) and 2 Micron All-Sky Survey (2MASS) surveys. The data, although sparse, can be represented by a power-law mass function, (M) M-, with 1 < < 2. Current results favor a value nearer the lower limit. If = 1.3, then the local space density of 0.075 > M/M > 0.01 brown dwarfs is 0.10 systems pc-3. In that case, brown dwarfs are twice as common as main-sequence stars but contribute no more than 15% of the total mass of the disk.
This is a pre-published version which is collected from arXiv. The published version is at http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/521/2/613/fulltext.
Astrophysics and Astronomy, Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics, 520
Astrophysics and Astronomy, Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics, 520
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 204 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
