
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>We study gravitational lensing by spiral galaxies, using realistic models consisting of halo, disk, and bulge components combined to produce a flat rotation curve. Proper dynamical normalization of the models is critical because a disk requires less mass than a spherical halo to produce the same rotation curve---a face-on Mestel disk has a lensing cross section only 41% as large as a singular isothermal sphere with the same rotation curve. The cross section is sensitive to inclination and dominated by edge-on galaxies, which produce lenses with an unobserved 2-image geometry and a smaller number of standard 5-image lenses. Unless the disk is unreasonably massive, disk+halo models averaged over inclination predict \lesssim 10% more lenses than pure halo models. Finally, models with an exponential disk and a central bulge are sensitive to the properties of the bulge. In particular, an exponential disk model normalized to our Galaxy cannot produce multiple images without a bulge, and including a bulge reduces the net flattening of edge-on galaxies. The dependence of the lensing properties on the masses and shapes of the halo, disk, and bulge means that a sample of spiral galaxy lenses would provide useful constraints on galactic structure.
27 pages, 7 postscript figures, submitted to ApJ
Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics
Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 142 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
