
arXiv: astro-ph/9707091
Hipparcos parallaxes have recently become available for a sample of Galactic Cepheids, and we have used these new distances to calibrate the Cepheid period-luminosity (PL) relation at six wavelengths (BVIJHK). Comparing these calibrations with previously published multiwavelength PL relations we find agreement to within 0.07 +/- 0.14 mag, or 4 +/- 7% in distance. Unfortunately, the current parallax errors for the fundamental pulsators (ranging in signal-to-noise = pi /sigma_pi from 0.3 to 5.3, at best) preclude an unambiguous interpretation of the observed differences, which may arise from a combination of true distance modulus, reddening and/or metallicity effects. We explore these effects and discuss their implications for the distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and the Cepheid-based extragalactic distance scale. These results suggest a range of LMC moduli between 18.44 +/-0.35 and 18.57 +/-0.11 mag; however, other effects on the Cepheid PL relation (e.g., extinction, metallicity, statistical errors) are still as significant as any such reassessment of its zero point.
15 pages, 4 figures, Ap. J. Letters, in press
Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics
Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 80 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
