
doi: 10.1086/296482
This article examines the essential role of bonding in most signaling models where quality is subject to moral hazard problems. An advertising model, in which advertising is a durable asset whose value is reduced by cheating, illustrates how the bonding capacity of a signal determines its cost. Characteristics of the market that govern how well a signal is targeted to relevant consumers and how information about cheating is spread are critical to determining bonding capacity and, hence, to the choice among potential signals. This bonding perspective explains the literature's widely divergent predictions about the conditions necessary for quality signals. Copyright 1990 by the University of Chicago.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 87 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
