
doi: 10.1086/282862
Recent work on the niche-variation model has yielded results which might lead to doubts concerning the value of the model. The analyses presented here, however, appear to provide more rigorous tests of the model, and two distinct approaches provide support for it. The first test compares the variability of species that are in the same community but have differing abundances. Common species generally have wider niches than less common ones, and therefore measures of variation should be roughly directly proportional to measures of abundance. Abundance and the coefficients of variation for bill length show significant positive correlations for 15 passerine species breeding on the Tres Marias Islands. A second test deals with the expectation that niche width is roughly inversely proportional to the amount of sympatry and hence actual and potential competition a population experiences with closely related forms. The amount of sympatry is quantified with an "index of sympatry" computed by assigning certain poin...
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 48 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
