
doi: 10.1086/262091 , 10.5167/uzh-70547
handle: 10230/20864 , 1721.1/64376
This paper offers a theory of development that links the degree of market incompleteness to capital accumulation and growth. At early stages of development, the presence projects limits the degree of risk spreading (diversification) that the economy can achieve. The desire to avoid highly risky investments slows down capital accumulation, and the inability to diversify idiosyncratic risk introduces a large amount of uncertainty in the growth process. The typical development pattern will consist of a lengthy period of “primitive accumulation” with highly variable output, followed by takeoff and financial deepening and, finally, steady growth. “Lucky” countries will spend relatively less time in the primitive accumulation stage and develop faster. Although all agents are price takers and there are no technological spillovers, the decentralized equilibrium is inefficient because individuals do not take into account their impact on others' diversification opportunities. We also show that our results generalize to economies with international capital flows.
330, 10007 Department of Economics, 2002 Economics and Econometrics, Macroeconomics and International Economics, Chance; Development; Diversification; Financial Intermediaries; Growth; Incomplete Markets; International Capital Flows; Pecuniary Externalities; Risk, 330 Economics, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:E44, jel: jel:G20
330, 10007 Department of Economics, 2002 Economics and Econometrics, Macroeconomics and International Economics, Chance; Development; Diversification; Financial Intermediaries; Growth; Incomplete Markets; International Capital Flows; Pecuniary Externalities; Risk, 330 Economics, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:E44, jel: jel:G20
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 850 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
