Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Mullahs, Muslims, and Marital Sorting

Authors: Scully, Gerald W;

Mullahs, Muslims, and Marital Sorting

Abstract

In 1974 Lee Benham investigated the hypothesis of a symbiotic transmission of human capital associated with marriage and its effect on the husbands earnings within the context of the United States marriage market. In the interest of seeing if Benhams results apply in a more traditional marriage market the data used in this study are from a sample household survey for Tehran Iran gathered in 1976. In Iran there are significant culturally induced barriers to entry and exit in the marriage market. Results obtained with the Tehran data can be compared with Benhams results for the U.S. The rate of return on education to husbands without the wives education in the equation was 9.0% for the U.S. and 9.7% for Iran. The coefficient on wifes education was 4.1% for the U.S. and 3.7% for Iran with a reduction in the coefficient of husbands school to 7.0% in the U.S. and to 7.7% in Iran. The total rate of return was 11.1% for the U.S. and 11.4% for Iran. The increase in the standard error of the husbands coefficient was 0.66 for the U.S. and 0.68 for Iran. The results obtained with data on married males in Tehran are consistent with U.S. results. The rates of return to schooling for the husband which include the effect of wifes education on husbands earnings were calculated and no evidence was found that the joint productivity of human-capital interaction within marriage is a function of the endowment of human capital. It appears that above 6 years of schooling the rates of return from the wife are about 4.0% while the rates of return due to the husband rise across schooling levels. There is some evidence that it is costly for males in the lower end of the schooling distribution to marry females who possess a level of schooling 1 level lower than the husbands.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!