
doi: 10.1086/260254
This note attempts to explain how unorganized, passive, ill-informed voters collectively influence policy choice without expressing policy preferences. In our theorizing about democracy we have thought too exclusively of the voter as choosing between candidates and parties according to his policy preferences, like a consumer choosing between alternative sets of products. Consequently we have too often assumed that the electorate must somehow discriminate between proposed policy alternatives in order to influence policy choice. 1 Toward a broader theory of voter influence, we shall treat actual policy decisions as governmental inputs into the voter's environment that, together with his own choices, affect his ex post utility.2 In this model, voters greatly economize their political efforts by voting to remove a government whenever they become dissatisfied with the utility changes they attribute to it; voters judge performance without understanding the
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
