
doi: 10.1086/259941
Milton Friedman's contention that the crucial theoretical difference between Keynesians and monetarists is that Keynesians assume rigid prices is shown to be factually and logically wrong. Distinctively monetarist propositions and prescriptions depend not on price flexibility but on the assumed insensitivity of monetary velocity to interest rates. To avoid this assumption, Friedman's second "monetary theory of nominal income" takes interest rates as exogenous in the short run; but the model has strange inconsistencies and implications. Finally, Friedman's longrun quantity theory propositions are shown to apply only to economies where money is the sole exogenous nominal magnitude.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 47 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
