
doi: 10.1086/259812
The analysis of migration flows is naturally concerned with the relationships between migration and such variables as incomes or income differentials, employment opportunities, and distance. But before this can proceed, a prior question needs to be answered: whether to study gross or net migration flows. It is commonplace to observe that gross migration flows are typically far greater than the corresponding net flows. Little explanation is provided for this observation, and not much guidance is therefore available in the choice of the dependent variable. The choice is generally based on convenience, for example, the availability of data, or on rather arbitrary inclinations of the investigator.' This paper examines at the theoretical level the distinction among three
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 99 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
