
doi: 10.1086/259634
In the current debate on international monetary reform the protagonists can be grouped into two main camps. On the one hand, the AngloAmericans maintain that what is most urgently needed is a major addition to the stock of international reserves. They fear that without a larger supply of international means of payment countries will be forced to adopt measures which restrict trade and foreign payments and which interfere with the attainment of domestic policy goals. On the other hand, the Continentals stress the importance of faster adjustment on the part of countries which have deficits in their balance of payments. They argue that if governments make a determined effort to eliminate payments deficits as soon as they arise, the need for large injections of new reserves is considerably reduced. One group therefore sees the world economy as best served if countries are allowed to finance a deficit over an extended period, whereas the other regards less financing and greater speed in making payments equal to receipts as the key to improvement in the international monetary system.'
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 64 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
