
doi: 10.1086/259079
FUTURES markets have been analyzed in two apparently different ways for the purpose of evaluating their efficiency for hedging purposes. The different approaches purport to reflect different concepts of hedging. The main objective of this article is to examine the relationship between the two testing procedures and to consider the adequacy of the tests in the light of the relevant concepts of hedging.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
