
doi: 10.1086/209096
This article examines the relative importance of a variety of factors in influencing hierarchical choice. In our first experiment, we test some implications of Tversky and Sattath's (1979) Hierarchical Elimination Model (HEM) relating to a choice set in which an external constraint has been imposed. (An external constraint changes the decision process by partitioning the brands in a different way than the consumer naturally would.) Our experimental results and the theoretical predictions do not converge. While they agree that external partitions do affect choice probabilities, they differ on the nature of the effect. Next, we run a second experiment to test alternative explanations of our empirical results. Using these results, we propose managerial implications for positioning a #1 and #2 brand.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 77 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
