
doi: 10.1086/208950
s it is usually phrased, the question of external validity has to do with whether the results of a behavioral study would hold for other persons, settings, times, or places. Consistent with the original notions of Campbell and Stanley (1966) and Cook and Campbell (1977), we have argued that this concept of external validity is relatively less important than other forms of validity when the objective of research is to test theory (Calder, Phillips, and Tybout 1981, 1982). Our position is that external validity is a matter of the applicability of behavioral research.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 114 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
