Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The Astrophysical Jo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
The Astrophysical Journal
Article . 1995 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/ar...
Article . 1994
License: arXiv Non-Exclusive Distribution
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

The Contribution of Low Surface Brightness Galaxies to Faint Galaxy Counts

Authors: Ferguson, Henry C.; McGaugh, Stacy S.;

The Contribution of Low Surface Brightness Galaxies to Faint Galaxy Counts

Abstract

Low Surface-Brightness (LSB) galaxies are severely underrepresented in surveys used to define the local luminosity function (LF), but could it in principle be detected in deep surveys. To explore the possible contribution of such objects to faint galaxy counts, we construct catalogs of simulated non-evolving galaxies drawn from a multivariate distribution of galaxy luminosities, central surface brightnesses, bulge/disk ratios and spectral-energy distributions. We compare two models dominated by LSB galaxies to a standard non-evolving model. Model galaxies are convolved with seeing and selected in a manner that closely matches real surveys. For each model we compute the local LF, HI mass function, number counts, redshift and color distributions. We find it possible to include a large population of LSB galaxies and incorporate a steep faint-end slope of the LF in our simulations without violating the constraints on the local LF or HI mass function. For $q_0 = 0.5$, the most favorable model matches the counts to B=23, but falls short of the observations at fainter magnitudes. The colors and redshift distributions remain roughly consistent with observations to B=24. The most serious discrepancy with observations is in the distribution of $r_e$ at faint magnitudes, suggesting that the model contains too many LSB galaxies. Nevertheless, the results suggest that LSB galaxies could be a significant contributor to faint-galaxy counts, reducing the need for such extreme models of galaxy evolution as rapid merging or bursting dwarf galaxies.

39p, uuencoded compressed postscript, 18/21 figs included, full paper from http://planxty.stsci.edu:1024/ ferguson/lsb/lsbpp_b.ps,STScI 874

Keywords

Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    43
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
43
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Green
gold