
The formation and evolution of an X--ray cluster is studied using a 3--D N-body + hydrodynamical simulation which includes feedback of energy and iron from cluster galaxies. The differences in evolution and final state between the simulation and a similar run without feedback are highlighted. We address the energetics of cluster gas; the distribution of dark matter, gas, and galaxies; the thermodynamic state of cluster gas, the beta model, and the beta discrepancy; x-ray evolution; the validity of estimates of the binding mass and of the baryon fraction of the cluster; dynamics of the galaxy population and velocity bias; and of the evolution of the iron abundance distribution in the cluster. We find that preheating by galactic winds results in a lower core density for the ICM, which in turn makes the simulated cluster fainter at high redshift and undergo rapid luminosity evolution to the present. A strong iron abundance gradient is present, even at high redshift. Velocity bias is present in the galaxy population; this bias combined with the preheating from winds drives the value of $β_{spec}\,=\,σ^{2}/\left(kT/μm_{p}\right)$ to values less than one. The two fluid simulation, modelling infall only, predicts $β_{spec}\,\geq\,1$, less in line with observation.
36 pages (15 figures available upon request), LaTeX (modified AAS style included), submitted to the Astrophysical Journal, UM AC 93-12
Galaxies : X-rays, Intergalactic Medium, Physics, Science, Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Cosmology : Theory, Galaxies : Clustering, Astrophysics
Galaxies : X-rays, Intergalactic Medium, Physics, Science, Astrophysics (astro-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Cosmology : Theory, Galaxies : Clustering, Astrophysics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 116 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
