Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Possibility of Compensating Astronomical Seeing

Authors: H. W. Babcock;

The Possibility of Compensating Astronomical Seeing

Abstract

The severe limitations imposed upon nearly all astronomical observations by "seeing" the effects resulting from passage of light rays through the turbulent atmosphere of the earth are familiar to every observer. With a small instrument the effect may appear largely as a continual shifting and scintillation of the image of a star, but with a large telescope poor seeing usually manifests itself mainly as an enlargement and blurring of the image. The reason for this difference becomes apparent when one makes a knife-edge test with a large telescope on a bright star. The turbulent elements of the atmosphere appear as shifting dark and bright areas on the image of the objective. In general these turbulent elements or waves have dimensions of the order of a foot or two small compared to the aperture of a large reflector. Thus the integrated effect of a number of turbulent elements leads to an unsteady enlargement of the image, perhaps with some irregular shifting in position. The seriousness of this is evident when one realizes that ideally the 200-inch Hale telescope is capable of giving diffraction images of stars about %0 oi a second of arc in diameter, yet the size of the "seeing image" produced is in the range j4 second to perhaps 5 or 10 seconds, being about 2 seconds in diameter on the average. Only rarely are images as small as yi second observed, and one may consider himself fortunate to experience one hour out of 1000 of the finest seeing, even at the best locations.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    543
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 0.1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 0.1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
543
Top 0.1%
Top 0.1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!