
It has been suggested that Fas ligand–Fas receptor interactions are involved in the regulation of eosinophil apoptosis and that dysfunctions in this system could contribute to the accumulation of these cells in allergic and asthmatic diseases. Here, we demonstrate that nitric oxide (NO) specifically prevents Fas receptor–mediated apoptosis in freshly isolated human eosinophils. In contrast, rapid acceleration of eosinophil apoptosis by activation of the Fas receptor occurs in the presence of eosinophil hematopoietins. Analysis of the intracellular mechanisms revealed that NO disrupts Fas receptor–mediated signaling events at the level of, or proximal to, Jun kinase (JNK), but distal to sphingomyelinase (SMase) activation and ceramide generation. In addition, activation of SMase occurs downstream of an interleukin 1 converting enzyme–like (ICE-like) protease(s) that is not blocked by NO. However, NO prevents activation of a protease that targets lamin B1. These findings suggest a role for an additional NO-sensitive apoptotic signaling pathway that amplifies the proteolytic cascade initialized by activation of the Fas receptor. Therefore, NO concentrations within allergic inflammatory sites may be important in determining whether an eosinophil survives or undergoes apoptosis upon Fas ligand stimulation.
Fas Ligand Protein, Membrane Glycoproteins, Cell Survival, Histocytochemistry, Immunoblotting, Apoptosis, Flow Cytometry, Nitric Oxide, Second Messenger Systems, Coculture Techniques, Eosinophils, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Nasal Polyps, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Humans, RNA, Nitric Oxide Synthase, Signal Transduction
Fas Ligand Protein, Membrane Glycoproteins, Cell Survival, Histocytochemistry, Immunoblotting, Apoptosis, Flow Cytometry, Nitric Oxide, Second Messenger Systems, Coculture Techniques, Eosinophils, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Nasal Polyps, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Humans, RNA, Nitric Oxide Synthase, Signal Transduction
| citations The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest. | 174 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
