
pmid: 15554223
Different types of mucoadhesive polymers, intended for buccal tablet formulation, were investigated for their comparative mucoadhesive force, swelling behavior, residence time and surface pH. The selected polymers were carbopols (CP934, and CP940), polycarbophil (PC), sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (SCMC) and pectin representing the anionic type, while chitosan (Ch) as cationic polymer and hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose (HPMC) as a non-ionic polymer. Results revealed that polyacrylic acid derivatives (PAA) showed the highest bioadhesion force, prolonged residence time and high surface acidity. SCMC and chitosan ensured promising bioadhesive characteristics, whilst HPMC and pectin exhibited weaker bioadhesion. Different polymer combinations as well as formulations were evaluated to improve the mucoadhesive performance of the tablets. Bioadhesive tablet formulations containing either 5% CP934, 65% HPMC and 30% spray-dried lactose or 2% PC, 68% HPMC and 30% mannitol showed optimum mucoadhesion and suitable residence time. SCMC, when formulated individually, exhibited promising bioadhesion, acceptable swelling, convenient residence time and surface pH. In-vivo trials of these formulations proved non-irritative and prolonged residence of the mucoadhesive tablets on human buccal mucosa for 8 to 13 h.
Adult, Time Factors, Polymers, Surface Properties, Mouth Mucosa, Adhesiveness, Administration, Buccal, Water, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Middle Aged, Solubility, Animals, Humans, Rabbits, Tablets
Adult, Time Factors, Polymers, Surface Properties, Mouth Mucosa, Adhesiveness, Administration, Buccal, Water, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Middle Aged, Solubility, Animals, Humans, Rabbits, Tablets
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 115 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
