
doi: 10.1080/758530894
This paper presents empirical evidence on the monetary model of exchange rate determination that is in contrast with the bulk of existing empirical evidence. The Johansen multivariate technique of cointegration is applied to an unrestricted form of a version of the monetary model that allows distinction between traded and non-traded goods. Using three exchange rates and monthly data covering the period 1975–86, strong evidence is found in favour of the existence of cointegration between nominal exchange rate and a vector of explanatory variables. Furthermore, statistical testing of restrictions on the coefficients in the monetary model leads to the rejection of the restrictions except for some in the case of Germany. Two conclusions are reached: the monetary model can still be a valid representation of the long-run behaviour of exchange rates; and that the restrictions imposed on the model are in general not valid and may have been a factor contributing to the failure of the model in previous studies. How...
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
