<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
User-friendly computational tools for 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing analysis enable researchers who are not bioinformaticians to analyze and interpret sequencing data from microbial communities. These tools' easy-to-use interfaces belie the sophisticated and rapidly-evolving science of their underlying algorithms. When analyzing 16S data from a simple microbiome experiment, we found that superficially unimportant decisions about the bioinformatic pipeline led to results with radically different biological interpretations. We share these results as a cautionary tale whose moral is that, in 16S analysis, the devil is in the details. Wet bench researchers should therefore strongly consider partnering with bioinformaticians or computational biologists when analyzing 16S data.
DNA, Bacterial, Bacteria, microbiome, Computational Biology, Genes, rRNA, bioinformatics, RC799-869, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Mice, Helicobacter, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, intestinal inflammation, microbiota, Animals, Algorithms, 16s rrna
DNA, Bacterial, Bacteria, microbiome, Computational Biology, Genes, rRNA, bioinformatics, RC799-869, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Mice, Helicobacter, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, intestinal inflammation, microbiota, Animals, Algorithms, 16s rrna
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |