Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
AIHAJarrow_drop_down
AIHAJ
Article . 1994 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
AIHAJ
Article . 1994 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
AIHAJ
Article . 1994
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Strategies for Determining Occupational Exposures in Risk Assessments: A Review and a Proposal for Assessing Fungicide Exposures in the Lumber Industry

Authors: Kay Teschke; Andrew Jin; Stephen A. Marion; C. van Netten; R. A. Fenske;

Strategies for Determining Occupational Exposures in Risk Assessments: A Review and a Proposal for Assessing Fungicide Exposures in the Lumber Industry

Abstract

To select an exposure monitoring protocol for assessing the occupational risk of fungicides in the lumber industry, the main strategies for determining exposures for risk assessment were reviewed. A survey of lumber industry work sites using fungicides observed the methods of application and opportunities for exposure. In addition, a review of existing measurement data was done. These investigations indicated that fungicide application techniques and process locations were varied from site to site, such that it would be extremely difficult to select a few representative locations for quasi-experimental studies, as is usually done in agricultural pesticide exposure assessment. Existing measurement data mainly describe exposures to fungicides no longer in use, and do not cover the range of application techniques or process technology observed in the survey. A probability sample of the exposed population was therefore proposed.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Risk Factors, Occupational Exposure, Wood, Environmental Monitoring, Fungicides, Industrial

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!