
handle: 2434/154073
Abstract Since the first investigations on web-graph compression, it has been clear that the ordering of the nodes of a web graph has a fundamental influence on the compression rate (usually expressed as the number of bits per link). The authors of the LINK database [Randall et al. 02], for instance, investigated three different approaches: an extrinsic ordering (URL ordering) and two intrinsic orderings based on the rows of the adjacency matrix (lexicographic and Gray code); they concluded that URL ordering has many advantages in spite of a small penalty in compression. In this paper we approach this issue in a more systematic way, testing some known orderings and proposing some new ones. Our experiments are made in the WebGraph framework [Boldi and Vigna 04], and show that the compression technique and the structure of the graph can produce significantly different results. In particular, we show that for a transposed web graph, URL ordering is significantly less effective, and that some new mixed orderi...
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 46 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
