Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Silicosis in the 1980's

Authors: Daniel E. Banks; Kathy L. Morring; Brian A. Boehlecke;

Silicosis in the 1980's

Abstract

At the request of the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recently investigated the health of workers at two silica flour mills. Both mills have a long history of failure to maintain workplace concentrations of dust containing free silica below the MSHA exposure standard. Thirty-seven percent of sixty-one workers and ex-workers with one or more years of silica dust exposure had chest radiographic evidence of silicosis. Because of the high prevalence of silicosis in workers at these two silica flour producers, MSHA silica dust measurements were reviewed for twenty-five other active U.S. silica flour producers. Eighty-nine percent of the work force in these 27 silica flour producers are employed at workplaces where more than twenty-five percent of the dust samples reviewed were above the exposure standard. Fifty-three percent of all samples were above the MSHA standard. No significant decline in silica dust levels occurred during the period (1974-1979) covered by the data supplied by MSHA. Based on the NIOSH study and MSHA data, it is apparent that the risk of silicosis is very high among workers in this industry. Prevention of this disease will require a concerted effort of government enforcement agencies, workers and management.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Silicosis, Humans, Dust, Environmental Exposure, Silicon Dioxide

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!