
handle: 1854/LU-1146093
Over the last decade, Europe has seen a marked increase in the use of the polygraph for the detection of deception. Belgium and Finland nowadays regularly use polygraph tests in criminal investigations, and the United Kingdom and the Netherlands have adopted its use in the treatment and monitoring of sex offenders. Still, the use of the polygraph for the detection of deception has been debated in the scientific literature for ages. In this article, we highlight the promises and perils of the use of the polygraph for the detection of deception.
WORK, CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, SEX OFFENDERS, GUILTY KNOWLEDGE TEST, INFORMATION, sex offender monitoring, Social Sciences, sex offender treatment, LIE-DETECTION, deception, lie detector, TESTS, polygraph
WORK, CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, SEX OFFENDERS, GUILTY KNOWLEDGE TEST, INFORMATION, sex offender monitoring, Social Sciences, sex offender treatment, LIE-DETECTION, deception, lie detector, TESTS, polygraph
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
