
If cultural studies is in crisis, the answer to it is not to be found in some theoretical or methodological claims proper to the field (for instance, concerning the specificity of its object, culture), but in its two ‘transversal’ qualities: on the one hand its political commitment, on the other hand its interdisciplinarity. Discussing two attacks launched against inderdisciplinarity (S. Fish and R. Krauss), this article attempts to reconcile a new cultural studies agenda (language, technology, history, law) and a permanent reflection on the very sense of the whole enterprise (and this is where cultural studies and philosophy meet).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
