
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 19089759
Not even half the number of the patients included in this study (N = 46) had been noticed as intermittent. Diplopia (N = 5) is not a reliable criterium. They need surgery with comparatively large amounts, on which behalf we prefer bi-medial rectus recessions. The prevailing result is "subnormal binocular vision," not to be confused with microtropia. Only four patients reached a cure, which means that they could not be differentiated from unaffected individuals any more.
Adult, Reoperation, Vision, Binocular, Esotropia, Infant, Vision, Low, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Oculomotor Muscles, Recurrence, Child, Preschool, Diplopia, Humans, Postoperative Period, Child, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Reoperation, Vision, Binocular, Esotropia, Infant, Vision, Low, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Oculomotor Muscles, Recurrence, Child, Preschool, Diplopia, Humans, Postoperative Period, Child, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
