Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Intravitreal Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab: A Review of Risk

Authors: Rima M. Dafer; Walter M. Jay; Michael J. Schneck; Thomas R. Friberg;

Intravitreal Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab: A Review of Risk

Abstract

Ranibizumab (Lucentis), a recombinant monoclonal antibody, blocks all active forms of vascular endothelial growth factor A and was the first treatment for age-related macular degeneration shown to improve visual acuity in a substantial percentage of patients rather than slowing visual loss. Bevacizumab (Avastin) has a similar action, is related to the ranibizumab compound with respect to its structure, but has not been approved by the FDA for intravitreal use and therefore must be utilized only in an off-label setting. While ranibizumab was approved by the FDA at a dose of 0.5 mg per intravitreal injection, the manufacturer recently issued a letter to physicians warning of the increased risk of stroke at the FDA-approved dose as compared to a lower studied dose of 0.3 mg. An interim analysis of the ongoing SAILOR study revealed a 1.2% risk of stroke in the 0.5 mg arm versus 0.3% in the 0.3 mg arm (p = 0.02). It is unclear whether the trend toward a higher risk of stroke in patients receiving 0.5 mg dose of ranibizumab would persist in the final analysis, but details such as causality, topography, and severity of stroke in the SAILOR study should also be delineated. The risks of intraocular use of bevacizumab remain largely unknown at this time.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Risk Assessment, Injections, Bevacizumab, Stroke, Vitreous Body, Macular Degeneration, Ranibizumab, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    58
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
58
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?