<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

REGULATING REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Mar 2000Publisher:Informa UK LimitedJournal:Journal of Legal Medicine, volume 21, pages 35-65 (issn: 0194-7648, eissn: 1521-057X,

Authors: Lori B. Andrews; Nanette Elster;

doi: 10.1080/019476400272792

pmid: 10730011

REGULATING REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

(2000). REGULATING REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES. Journal of Legal Medicine: Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 35-65.

Related Organizations

Chicago Kent College of Law
United States
University of Chicago
United States
Illinois Institute of Technology
United States

Keywords

Gestational Carriers, Informed Consent, Social Values, Cloning, Organism, Patient Advocacy, United States, Reproductive Techniques, Humans, Ethics, Medical, Social Change, Attitude to Health, Facility Regulation and Control

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	24
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%