
Abstract Advertising and market researchers continue to look to the behavioral sciences for techniques and procedures in the hope of explaining, accounting for. describing and classifying consumers and their buying behavior. The use of projective techniques and their fallacies are discussed in this paper. A survey of the literature as well as experience in applying such techniques to consumers reveals their total incapacity and inapplicability to consumers. It is concluded that advertising and marketing would be better advised to expend time and effort on analyzing buying and use behavior rather than “personality”, “trait”, “attitudinal”, “psychographic” or consumer life styles.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
