
pmid: 11200378
To evaluate and compare the usefulness of IS6110-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and spoligotyping in the epidemiology of tuberculosis in Iran, Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains, isolated in 2 different areas of Iran, were subjected to RFLP and spoligotyping. The average number of IS6110 copies per strain was 11 and ranged from 5 to 18 among the M. tuberculosis strains. In total, among the 62 isolates, 56 different patterns were observed. 50 strains had unique RFLP patterns (89%) and 12 (11%) revealed patterns that were found among at least 1 other isolate. Spoligotyping of 97 isolates resulted in 42 different patterns, of which 72% were found in 15 clusters. 14 (29%) out of 48 investigated isolates were resistant to 1 or more antituberculosis drugs and 57% of the resistant isolates were isolated from Afghan immigrants. Ten percent of the isolates represented the Beijing genotype, including 4 of the 14 (36%) resistant strains. Three of these resistant Beijing strains were isolated from Afghan patients. IS6110-RFLP typing could be useful for studying the epidemiology of tuberculosis in Iran. IS6110 patterns were polymorphic and the average IS6110 copy number was high.
Molecular Epidemiology, Polymorphism, Genetic, Genotype, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Iran, DNA Fingerprinting, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Tuberculosis, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid
Molecular Epidemiology, Polymorphism, Genetic, Genotype, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Iran, DNA Fingerprinting, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Tuberculosis, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 49 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
