Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Ratings of perceived exertion at the anaerobic threshold

Authors: Jame W. Purvis; Kirk J. Cukiton;

Ratings of perceived exertion at the anaerobic threshold

Abstract

To determine ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) at the anaerobic threshold (AT), 13 men and 17 women, 21 to 37 years of age. performed a progressive, load-incremented bicycle ergometer stress test during which physiological measurements and RPE were obtained every 30s. The mean (± SD) AT expressed as a percentage of the maximal oxygen uptake was 60.1 ± 7.8 and 60.3 ± 7.7 for males and females respectively. Ratings of perceived exertion at anaerobic threshold (RPE-AT) ranged from 11 to 16. The mean RPE-AT for females (13.1 ±0.9), males (14.2± 0.9) and the combined group (13.6+1.2) corresponded to a perception of work as ‘somewhat hard’. It was concluded that young men and women perceive an exercise intensity equal to the anaerobic threshold as ‘somewhat hard’. The similar perception of the exercise intensity corresponding to anaerobic threshold by different individuals makes it possible to prescribe an exercise intensity equivalent to the anaerobic threshold using ratings of perceived exertion.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Exertion, Humans, Female, Perception, Anaerobiosis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    92
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
92
Top 10%
Top 1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?