Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao IRIS - Università de...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://doi.org/10.1079/978085...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2007 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Origin and taxonomy.

Authors: I. A. Khan; E. Nicolosi;

Origin and taxonomy.

Abstract

Different hypotheses have been formulated on the history and geographical origin of citrus. It would appear that all the species belonging to Citrus and its related genera originated in the tropical and subtropical regions of South-east Asia, north-eastern India, southern China, the Indo-Chinese peninsula and the Malay Archipelago, and then spread to other continents. Several authors consider that the primordial genetic nucleus of citrus originated in China and the citrus slowly passed from its original location to other oriental regions and from there followed the paths of civilization.The majority of taxonomists consider that citrus species belong to the Geraniales order, the Rutaceae family and the Aurantioideae subfamily. The taxonomic situation of tribes, subtribes, genera and species within the Aurantioideae is controversial, complex and sometimes confusing. The first descriptions and classifications of citrus species and varieties date back to the seventeenth century, while the morphological description of the trees, the floral morphology and biology or the different use of the fruit date back to ancient times (Teophrastus 310 BC, Virgil 70-19 BC, Pliny 27-79 AD etc.). John Baptista Ferrarius in 1646 made the first organic contribution to citrus studies followed by Volkamer (1708), Linneus (1767), Burmann (1768), De Loureiro (1790), Gallesio (1811), Risso (1813), and many others. Today two different classification systems are commonly accepted for the citrus taxonomy: the system of Swingle (1943, 1967) and that of Tanaka (1954, 1961). Taxonomic studies received a boost from the work of Barrett and Rhodes in 1976. Their study suggested that only three citrus types, namely the citron, Citrus medica, the mandarin, Citrus reticulata and the pummelo, Citrus grandis, constituted true or valid species. The concept of the true valid species and the other genotypes derived from hybridization between them, has gained further support from various studies using biochemical and molecular markers. Several authors in the recent years have studied the phylogenetic relationships in Citrus, analyzing the relationships among hundreds of accessions of Citrus and related genera. Moreover a lot of hypotheses have been formulated on the genetic origin of the main citrus species. The present study examines the results achieved by now.

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
Keywords

Citrus; Genetic Variability; Citrus Clementina

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    47
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
47
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?