Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.1...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Discourse markers and discourse relations

The French DM quoi
Authors: Adriana Costăchescu;

Discourse markers and discourse relations

Abstract

Abstract We investigate if and how Discourse Markers (DMs) can be integrated into a dynamic semantic framework (in the SDRT variant, cf. Asher & Lascarides 2003, 2008, 2009) in order to study the relationships between discursive markers and rhetoric relations in a dialogue. We assume that short answers (Schlangen & Lascarides 2003) and DMs have the same basic characteristics: (i) both are semantically under-specified; (ii) in both cases, the receiver adds, by deduction, significant elements, in order to narrow, or even eliminate the semantic under-specification. We illustrate the possibility of integrating the DMs in the SDRT by examining the behaviour of the French DM quoi ‘what’ in a corpus in expressing rhetorical relations, such as: Explanation(α, β) (A: – Le curé est arrivé à pied, ou quoi ? B: – Il est venu dans la voiture de Mathurin. ‘A : – The priest arrived on foot, or what? B: – He came in Mathurin’s car’) Contrast(α, β) (A: – Je vais attendre. B: - Attendre quoi? Ils viennent de sortir. ‘A : I am going to wait. B: – What for? They have just left’); Phatic(α, β), when the channel is not functioning (A: -Coco! B (who is hard of hearing): – Quoi ? A: (screaming) – Ils te disent au revoir. ‘A: – Coco! B : -What? A: – They are saying ‘good bye’ to you’). The study of DMs within SDRT tells us a lot about the deductive processes implied by the good functioning the human communication.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!