
Previous research on Dutch gender reveals that nowadays pronoun usage mainly depends on different conceptualizations of the referent, rather than relying on grammatical principles. The same seems to account also for gender fluctuations at the nominal level (double gender nouns), a marginal phenomenon commonly reduced to the issue of geographical variation. This paper intends to fill a gap in gender studies by demonstrating the relevancy of Dutch double gender nouns (DGNs) from both a synchronic and a diachronic perspective. The analysis of DGNs not only confirms the gradual loss of grammatical gender in favor of a (more) semantic system, but also that shared features as synonymy may have some correlation with gender opacity and help explaining the diachronic persistence of the phenomenon.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
