
Abstract This article aims to describe the use of mitigating reported speech concerning three general mitigation functions — self-protection, prevention, and repair — identified in the works of Albelda et al. (2014, 2021). This goal will be achieved through a review of relevant literature on this phenomenon and an analysis of 72 semi-structured interviews taken from the PRESEEA-Seville oral corpus. From a sociolinguistic perspective, we will also examine how the employ of mitigating reported speech functions is affected by three fundamental social criteria: gender, age, and level of education. Additionally, we will provide information on how frequently they are used. Generally, we observe a prevalence of the self-protection function, especially in the use of direct quotations. This helps to preserve the speaker’s face, resulting in a positive impact. In terms of social factors, this function is notable in both male and female participants with low levels of education, particularly among first-generation individuals.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
