
doi: 10.1075/rmal.5.04hor
This chapter focuses on survey methods for studying writing processes. We specifically focus on questionnaires, interviews, and process logs, which all represent subjective self-report instuments. We start by describing the affordances of these data collection procedures, and review some relevant L1 and L2 studies which employed them to study writing processes. We then address some methodological concerns in the use of the self-report instruments discussed in the chapter and finish by suggesting avenues for future research.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
