Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Pedagogical Linguist...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Pedagogical Linguistics
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Swedish medical students’ writing self-efficacy and writing beliefs regarding undergraduate thesis writing

A cross-sectional study using validated instruments
Authors: Emma Hansson; Monika Fagevik Olsén;

Swedish medical students’ writing self-efficacy and writing beliefs regarding undergraduate thesis writing

Abstract

Abstract Medical students in Sweden often write their first thesis in English as a foreign language without prior training in academic writing. This study examines their writing beliefs and self-efficacy, and how these may change during the writing process. Writing self-efficacy refers to a person’s belief in their ability to perform specific writing skills and tasks, such as writing a thesis. Forty-two Swedish medical students (42/300, 14%) completed validated questionnaires examining their writing self-efficacy and beliefs regarding the writing process: The Situated Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (SAWSES) and The Writing Process Questionnaire. Despite the medical students’ limited prior writing experience, they had a high writing self-efficacy, suggesting overconfidence. There was a slight tendency for the self-efficacy to decrease during the actual writing of the thesis. The students had the highest self-efficacy concerning more mechanical aspects of writing, such as using academic vocabulary and synthesising information, and the lowest self-efficacy concerning organising ideas and writing for an audience. Their beliefs could reflect immature writing development. The study’s results highlight the need for improved thesis preparation and clearer writing curriculum goals for medical students.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid
Related to Research communities