
The structure of scientific collaboration networks is investigated. Two scientists are considered connected if they have authored a paper together and explicit networks of such connections are constructed by using data drawn from a number of databases, including MEDLINE (biomedical research), the Los Alamos e-Print Archive (physics), and NCSTRL (computer science). I show that these collaboration networks form “small worlds,” in which randomly chosen pairs of scientists are typically separated by only a short path of intermediate acquaintances. I further give results for mean and distribution of numbers of collaborators of authors, demonstrate the presence of clustering in the networks, and highlight a number of apparent differences in the patterns of collaboration between the fields studied.
Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech), MEDLINE, Research, Science, FOS: Physical sciences, Models, Theoretical, Databases, Bibliographic, Authorship, Research Personnel, Sociology (and profession) of mathematics, Bibliometrics, Cluster Analysis, Humans, General and miscellaneous specific topics, Cooperative Behavior, Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics
Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech), MEDLINE, Research, Science, FOS: Physical sciences, Models, Theoretical, Databases, Bibliographic, Authorship, Research Personnel, Sociology (and profession) of mathematics, Bibliometrics, Cluster Analysis, Humans, General and miscellaneous specific topics, Cooperative Behavior, Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3K | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.01% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
