<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
This commentary is about the article by Feng, Cho, and Doolittle (1), a paper that addresses genealogical relationships between the three domains of organisms. First, however, I would like to be as forthcoming as possible on issues of nepotism and reveal another genealogy—that relating this paper’s senior author and me. Russell F. Doolittle and I recently have ascertained that we descend from a remote common ancestral couple—Ebeneezer and Hannah (nee Hall) Doolittle–via eight intermediate nodes on Russell’s side and seven, including two more Ebeneezers, on mine. We share Y chromosomes, if there have been no adoptions or other irregularities in either lineage, but eight generations should surely be enough to attenuate bias!
Evolution, Molecular, Bacteria, RNA, Ribosomal, Animals, Humans, Poisson Distribution, Archaea
Evolution, Molecular, Bacteria, RNA, Ribosomal, Animals, Humans, Poisson Distribution, Archaea
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |