
From bacterial viruses to humans, site-specific recombination and transposition are the major pathways for rearranging genomes on both long- and short-time scales. The site-specific pathways can be divided into 2 groups based on whether they are stochastic or regulated. Recombinases Cre and λ Int are well-studied examples of each group, respectively. Both have been widely exploited as powerful and flexible tools for genetic engineering: Cre primarily in vivo and λ Int primarily in vitro. Although Cre and Int use the same mechanism of DNA strand exchange, their respective reaction pathways are very different. Cre-mediated recombination is bidirectional, unregulated, does not require accessory proteins, and has a minimal symmetric DNA target. We show that when Cre is fused to the small N-terminal domain of Int, the resulting chimeric Cre recombines complex higher-order DNA targets comprising >200 bp encoding 16 protein-binding sites. This recombination requires the IHF protein, is unidirectional, and is regulated by the relative levels of the 3 accessory proteins, IHF, Xis, and Fis. In one direction, recombination depends on the Xis protein, and in the other direction it is inhibited by Xis. It is striking that regulated directionality and complexity can be conferred in a simple chimeric construction. We suggest that the relative ease of constructing a chimeric Cre with these properties may simulate the evolutionary interconversions responsible for the large variety of site-specific recombinases observed in Archaea, Eubacteria, and Eukarya.
Recombination, Genetic, Binding Sites, Base Sequence, Integrases, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Coliphages, Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA Primers
Recombination, Genetic, Binding Sites, Base Sequence, Integrases, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Coliphages, Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA Primers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
