
Failures of government policies often provoke opposite reactions from citizens; some call for a reversal of the policy, whereas others favor its continuation in stronger form. We offer an explanation of such polarization, based on a natural bimodality of preferences in political and economic contexts and consistent with Bayesian rationality.
information, D72, distinct priors, Humans, D74, Probability, polarization, ddc:330, Politics, D81, Staatliche Information, D82, Verhaltensökonomik, voting, Beschränkte Rationalität, polarization; voting; information, Politische Kultur, Theorie, jel: jel:D81, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:D74, jel: jel:D72
information, D72, distinct priors, Humans, D74, Probability, polarization, ddc:330, Politics, D81, Staatliche Information, D82, Verhaltensökonomik, voting, Beschränkte Rationalität, polarization; voting; information, Politische Kultur, Theorie, jel: jel:D81, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:D74, jel: jel:D72
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 104 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
