Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Sexual Healtharrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Sexual Health
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Sexual Health
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go...
Other literature type . 2022
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Diagnostic concordance between Amsel’s criteria and the Nugent scoring method in the assessment of bacterial vaginosis

Authors: Apoorva Challa; Seema Sood; Garima Kachhawa; Ashish Datt Upadhyay; Sada Nand Dwivedi; Somesh Gupta;

Diagnostic concordance between Amsel’s criteria and the Nugent scoring method in the assessment of bacterial vaginosis

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is diagnosed by the microbiological Nugent scoring method or clinical Amsel’s criteria. Assessment of 404 vaginal samples (293 women) identified 110 (27.2%), 108 (26.7%) and 161 (39.9%) samples to be BV-positive using Nugent’s method, standard Amsel’s criteria and simplified Amsel’s criteria respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistic (κ) for standard and simplified Amsel’s criteria were 71.8% (95% CI = 62.4–80.0), 90.1% (95% CI = 62.4–86.1), 0.62 (95% CI = 0.53–0.72) and 88.2% (95% CI = 80.6–93.6), 78.2% (95% CI = 73.1–82.8), 0.58 (95% CI = 0.49–0.67), respectively. A combination of vaginal pH and clue cells exhibited the highest concordance (κ = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.54–0.74) with Nugent’s method and may be used for simplified BV diagnosis.

Keywords

Research Design, Vagina, Humans, Female, Vaginosis, Bacterial

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
bronze