
doi: 10.1071/pp01021
handle: 1885/89417
Both the existing theory as well as the measurements that have traditionally been used to describe the water relations of plants in thermodynamic terms are not consistent with standard thermodynamic theory. In this article, three main errors are identified: (1) the assumption that the internal energy of a system includes the gravitational potential energy, when it does not; (2) the assumption that water spontaneously moves along gradients of chemical potential, when the Gibbs theory predicts that it would spontaneously move across phase boundaries, so that the chemical potential would be equal in adjacent phases; and (3) the assumption that plants and soil are single-phase systems, when they are in fact multi-phase systems. Examples are used to demonstrate the above errors. Measurements which can be used to separate plant and soil systems into bulk phases (i.e. solid, liquid and gas), which have long been used by wood and soil scientists, are shown to be ideal for the purpose of describing plant and soil systems using thermodynamic methods.
Ohm's law analogy, Phases, Physiology, Water potential, Water, water relations Chemical potential, methodology, Plant water relations, Thermodynamic methods, 541, Plants (botany), Thermodynamic properties, thermodynamics, Potential energy, Soils, Keywords: Gravitational effects, Plant growth
Ohm's law analogy, Phases, Physiology, Water potential, Water, water relations Chemical potential, methodology, Plant water relations, Thermodynamic methods, 541, Plants (botany), Thermodynamic properties, thermodynamics, Potential energy, Soils, Keywords: Gravitational effects, Plant growth
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
