Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Marine and Freshwate...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Marine and Freshwater Research
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Examining annual catch trends and gear selectivity of bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas): implications for Queensland’s coastal management

Authors: Riley W. Banaghan; Alexis L. Levengood; Bonnie J. Holmes;

Examining annual catch trends and gear selectivity of bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas): implications for Queensland’s coastal management

Abstract

Context In coastal waters of eastern Australia, the bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas) is one of the most frequently caught shark species within the Queensland Shark Control Program (QSCP). Aims An analysis of 27 years of QSCP catch data (1996–2022) involving 2352 bull sharks from nine locations spanning 1700 km captured in gill-nets or on drumlines identified changes in catch composition and gear selectivity. Methods Linear regression tested trends in length and catchability, and selectivity and bias were evaluated through mean and distribution comparison tests. Key results Drumlines caught more sharks (80.1%), indicating stronger selectivity for C. leucas of all size classes. A decline in standardised catch per unit effort (CPUE) was noted in tropical regions for each gear type, yet there were increases of bull sharks caught within subtropical gill-nets (P < 0.001). The sex ratio was female biased on drumlines (1.85:1) and in gill-nets (1.53:1). Conclusions Our findings corroborated previous research, highlighting the significance of considering regional variations in CPUE, sex ratios and size compositions of sharks caught in shark control programs. Implications Catch rates provide insights into shark population trends, particularly where gear configurations have remained relatively consistent. Downward trends may indicate unsustainable harvest, or external influences.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid